Neandertals

October 18, 2007

Neandertal FoxP2, human too

It was announced today that Neandertals had the same version of the FoxP2 gene that humans do. Because it's thought that our particular version of FoxP2 is involved in speech and language, it may be that Neandertals also had these skills. It'll be interesting to see if Neandertals get an upgrade accordingly, or if the significance of FoxP2 is now downgraded because it turns out to not be so uniquely human after all. National Geographic, Current Biology, Anthropology.net.

October 16, 2007

Neandertals in China?

More news from one the teams sequencing the Neandertal genome. Our large cousins traveled at least 2000 miles further than thought. Mitochondrial DNA analyses carried out by Svante Paabo and colleagues show that Neandertals traveled to central Asia and Siberia, and may even have reached Mongolia and China. Nature.

September 12, 2007

Weather didn't kill off Neandertals

Of the many possible explanations for the demise of the Neandertals (competition with humans, sex with humans and being folded into our genome, infection from humans, climate), researchers say in this week's Nature that climate can now be ruled out. A massive project at The University of Leeds examined three possible extinction dates for our sister species. They compared the dates with a deep-sea core drilled from the Cariaco Basin in Venezuela and found that in two cases there was no change in the weather, and in the last case, an encroaching cold change was 1000 years in the making--not the kind of cataclysmic event that would extinguish a species overnight.

A beautiful Neandertal smile

Neandertals took care of their teeth. Two molars over 64,000 years old show signs of regular cleaning. Reuters.

August 31, 2007

Neandertal genome project hits snag

Over the last year, two separate groups of researchers have been trying to sequence the Neandertal genome using DNA from the same fossil. An independent team assessed both group's analyses and announced this week that there were worrying inconsistencies between the two sets of findings. It's possible that at least one of the samples has been contaminated by modern human DNA. PLoS Genetics, Science.

August 06, 2007

Accidental beauty

The difference between the hulking heads of our Neanderthal cousins and our more graceful selves is merely a matter of chance, say scientists in the Journal of Human Evolution. The difference between our skulls and theirs probably results from genetic drift--meaning that our head shape was not selected by nature or in any sense 'intended' but only accidentally came to be. At least we got the nice skulls... the authors of the study say, "Neandertal and modern human crania may simply represent two outcomes from a vast space of random evolutionary possibilities." Anthropology.net, Science Direct/Journal of Human Evolution.

July 11, 2007

Chipping away at human uniqueness

The general consensus on the Neandertal mind is that it remained static for many hundreds of thousands of years. In Antiquity, Terry Hopkinson at the University of Leicester presents new evidence that Neandertals gradually innovated and developed technology throughout their time. 

July 09, 2007

Did they or didn't they?

Did Neandertals and humans interbreed? Every couple of years this question cycles through the press, generally instigated by a scientific article presenting new evidence either way. Erik Trinkaus, who compares the bones of ancient humans and Neandertals, is the best known for arguing that they did. Most recently, Spencer Wells of the Genographic Project, told Wired magazine there was no evidence in the human genome that Neandertals and their European human contemporaries produced any children.
Trinkaus in PNAS.

BOOK



  • A Los Angeles Times Book Prize finalist, The First Word is about the quest for the origins of human language. Although language is a distinctly human gift, it leaves no permanent trace and its evolution has long been a mystery. It is only in the last fifteen years that we have begun to understand how language came into being. The First Word follows two intertwined narratives. The first is an account of how the random and layered processes of evolution wound together to produce a talking animal: us. The second addresses why language evolution was considered a scientific taboo for more than a hundred years and why scientists are at last able to explore the subject.
  • Buy this book (Amazon.com)
  • Buy this book (Amazon.co.uk)
  • Buy this book (Powell's)
  • Buy this book (Barnes & Noble)

REVIEWS

  • from THE JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
    "The task she has undertaken... is formidable. Kenneally does it very well."
  • from NEUROLOGY TODAY
    "In addition to its astonishing breadth, this book is up to date, educational, and entertaining."
  • from AMERICAN SCIENTIST
    "...a lucid, readable, comprehensive account."
  • from THE FINANCIAL TIMES
    "[An] admirably serious update on the [language evolution] debate."
  • from THE NEW YORKER
    "[An] accessible account... including many provocative findings."
  • from THE BOSTON GLOBE
    "Kenneally's reporting and interpretation of this research, whose implications for the study of language and human nature are immense, occupy center stage in 'The First Word' and generate real excitement on the page."
  • from THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
    "...a cogent and often compelling account... As Kenneally dissects each scholar's theory, a wonderful evolution occurs on the pages: She explains, understatedly, what it means to be part of human nature."
  • from SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
    "...an elegant exposition."
  • from THE NEW YORK TIMES
    [A] lucid survey of this expanding field... covers an enormous expanse of ground as she brings the reader up to date on developments in a wide variety of disciplines touching on language evolution... explains difficult ideas concisely and clearly... scrupulously fair-minded... zeroes in on a host of fascinating experiments.
  • from THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW
    "[The] scientists who study the origins of language are a passionate, fractious bunch, and you don’t have to be an egghead to be tantalized by the questions that drive their research: how and when did we learn to speak, and to what extent is language a uniquely human attribute?... Much of what [Kenneally] describes is fascinating."

Book list picks

Advance praise

  • Steven Pinker
    "A clear and splendidly written account of a new field of research on a central question about the human species."
  • Steven Johnson
    "'The First Word' is a rare and delightful mix: both a probing exploration of one of the great remaining mysteries of life, and a riveting story of the battles and breakthroughs that drive scientific progress."

CHRISTINE KENNEALLY

  • I am a journalist and author who has written for The New Yorker, The New York Times, Slate and New Scientist, as well as other publications. My book, The First Word: The Search for the Origins of Language, was published in hardback by Viking in 2007. The paperback from Penguin is out now. Before becoming a reporter, I received a Ph.D. in linguistics from Cambridge University and a B.A. (Hons) in English and Linguistics from Melbourne University. I was born and raised in Melbourne, Australia, and have lived in England, Iowa, and Brooklyn, New York (ckenneally at ckenneally dot com).

Slate

New Scientist

Washington Post

The Boston Globe

  • Songs of ourselves:
    We like music that sounds just like us
  • Suicidal tendencies
    High intelligence is often associated with the kind of dramatic unhappiness that leads people to suicide. Think Virginia Woolf, Ernest Hemingway, or the notoriously high suicide rates of doctors.
  • Do they know something we don't?
    Animal senses may help them escape disaster
  • The brain solves problems during sleep
    An avalanche of inspirational literature, audiotapes, videos, and seminars promotes the idea that sleep leads to insight. But until recently the evidence for a connection between the two has been entirely anecdotal.

THE NEW YORKER

The Huffington Post

  • When speciesism is good
    Chimpanzees are smarter than humans. Orangutans are smarter than chimpanzees. Humans are smarter than chimpanzees. Which of these statements is true?
  • Alex
    Alex is dead. The 30-year-old African gray parrot was a resident of Irene Pepperberg's lab at Brandeis University, and for decades Pepperberg taught Alex elements of English.
  • Thank you Rod Stewart. Seriously.
    There's an unexplained mystery about the length of women's lives. Once their ability to have children shuts down, there is no obvious reason for their biology to resist all the forces that conspire to take them down. Indeed, according to demographic models, women over 50 should hit a "wall of death." But they don't. Why not?

Discover

  • AIBO as Research Tool
    When a real animal interacts with an animalbot, it's as though the human in control of the bot has donned a correct scale costume and disguised himself as a bird or a dog or even a bee.

Salon

  • Terrorist wannabes
    In the wake of unimaginable devastation, what motivates someone to phone in a bomb threat?

other articles


  • Other articles can be found at The New York Times, Wired News, Salon and Scientific American.
Blog powered by TypePad